The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is an independent company developed by the Congress to keep stability and public confidence in the country's monetary system. Learn about the FDIC's mission, leadership, history, career chances, and more.
Discover more About the FDIC
- What We Do
- Leadership
- Careers
- Initiatives
- Strategic Plans
- Financial Reports
- History
- Governance
- Ombudsman
- Doing Business with the FDIC
Resources
The FDIC provides a wealth of resources for consumers, bankers, analysts, and other stakeholders. Browse our collection of financial education products, data tools, documentation of laws and guidelines, info on important efforts, and more.
Additional FDIC Resources
- Consumer Resource Center
- Banker Resource Center
- Deposit Insurance
- Supervision & Examinations
- Laws & Regulations
- Resolutions
- Publications
- Forms
- Data Tools
- Community Banking Research Program
- International Seminars and Training
Analysis
The FDIC is happy to be a pre-eminent source of U.S. banking market research study, consisting of quarterly banking profiles, working papers, and state banking efficiency data. Browse our substantial research tools and reports.
More FDIC Analysis
- Center for Financial Research
- Consumer Research
- FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
- Quarterly Banking Profile
- FDIC Academic Challenge
- FDIC Quarterly
- Annual Risk Review
News
The FDIC publishes routine updates on news and activities. Keep up with FDIC announcements, checked out speeches and testimony on the current banking issues, learn about policy changes for banks, and get the details on upcoming conferences and occasions.
Find More FDIC News
- Press Releases
- Banks Letters
- Conferences & Events
- Board Matters
- Natural Disasters
- Media Campaigns
- Speeches, Statements & Testimonies
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Opinion Editorials
- Policy Fact Sheets
Breadcrumb
FIL-103-99 Attachment
Practices That might Result in Potential Violations of Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
In numerous markets, companies commonly pay commissions to 3rd parties for organization referrals. Congress sought to get rid of these kinds of payments for property loans so that "the expenses to the American home purchasing public will not be unreasonably or unnecessarily inflated." 1 As an outcome, payments connected to settlement services for federally associated mortgage loans should be reasonable compensation for the items, services, or facilities actually offered.
Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) usually restricts:
- The payment and receipt of a cost or thing of value in return for the recommendation of settlement service company for a federally associated mortgage loan, and
- Receipt or payment of any portion or divides of charges (consisting of unearned fees) other than for settlement services in fact performed.
RESPA uses just to "federally associated mortgage loans." 2 These are typically mortgages to customers that are likewise covered by the Truth in Lending Act. Mortgage loans produced service purposes are not covered by RESPA.
To understand which practices can be offenses of Section 8 of RESPA, the terms contained in RESPA and the Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Regulation X, which executes RESPA, must be comprehended. Some essential terms follow:
- "Settlement service" is broadly specified in Regulation X. The term consists of "any service offered in conjunction with a prospective or real settlement." 3 An extensive list of examples of settlement services is included in Section 3500.2 of Regulation X.
- "Thing of value," likewise broadly defined, includes all types of settlement such as monies, discounts, salaries, commissions, charges, and preferential bank rates.4 HUD has described the chance to win a prize as a thing of worth. For instance, a bank can not go into genuine estate representatives in a swimming pool to win a trip to Hawaii if a particular variety of consumers are referred to the bank for a mortgage loan.5.
- "Referral" includes "any oral or written action directed to a person which has the result of affirmatively influencing the choice by anybody of a company of a settlement service or part of a settlement service when such individual will pay for such settlement service or service occurrence thereto or pay a charge attributable in entire or in part to such settlement service or organization." 6 It likewise includes "any circumstances in which a person paying for a settlement service or business occurrence thereto is required to utilize a particular provider of settlement service or organization occurrence thereto." 7.
- "Agreement or understanding" is not particularly defined in Regulation X. However, the regulation does state that" [a] n agreement or understanding for the referral of service incident to or part of a settlement service need not be composed or explained in words but might be established by a practice, pattern, or course of conduct. When a thing of worth is gotten consistently and is linked in any way with the volume or worth of the business referred, the receipt of the important things of worth is evidence that it is made pursuant to an agreement or understanding for the recommendation of service." 8.
Repeated conduct is not a vital aspect that is needed to demonstrate a violation of Section 8. A violation may be developed by showing either that a payment was made as compensation for recommendations of past service or for the function of protecting referrals in the future. In an informal viewpoint, HUD kept in mind that where there is proof of duplicated payments connected in any way with the volume or worth of service, an administrative anticipation is produced that the payments were made "pursuant to an agreement or understanding." 9
Situations in Which Lenders May Violate Section 8
Fee Splitting and Payments for Services Not Performed - Examiners have actually kept in mind recent occurrences in which the charge gathered by a financial institution for a third-party service surpassed the amount the institution actually paid to that 3rd party. For instance, a banks charged customers $25 for a flood threat decision, yet the flood risk decision company that supplied the service was just paid $20. In another example, clients were charged $40 for a credit report, but the banks just paid $15 to the consumer-reporting agency for the customer report. Examiners also discovered an occurrence in which an institution charged consumers an appraisal examination cost. The fee was passed on to a committee comprised of several members of the institution's board of directors, which did not actually examine the appraisals. HUD has actually believed that these plans constitute cost splitting or invoice of unearned fees and therefore violate Section 8( b) of RESPA.10
Contracts with Third-Party Settlement Company - Some banks have actually contracted with third-party settlement provider for such services as flood threat decisions, and real estate tax and hazard insurance coverage services. In exchange for performing these services for all loans stemmed by the institution during the term of the contract, some firms have actually accepted perform the services for loans that were on the organization's books before getting in into the agreement for no additional charge or a significantly lowered fee. HUD has actually identified that these kinds of contracts remain in violation of Section 8 since they supply a thing of value for the referral of future settlement services.11
Referral Fees from Other Banks or Mortgage Companies - Some financial institutions that would like to offer a range of property loan products to some of their clients do not have the needed competence to provide them. As a result, the organizations in some cases make arrangements to refer their customers to other monetary organizations or mortgage business. Payments made pursuant to these recommendation arrangements need to be for products and services really carried out and affordable in an amount comparable to deals within the same market. HUD issued a policy declaration on March 1, 1999, attending to a list of the services that ought to be carried out by the referring party for originating RESPA-related loans in order to get compensation. This policy statement was released in the FDIC's FIL-21-99, dated March 12, 1999.
Referral Fees From Mortgage Companies to Affiliated Banks' Employees - Some financial organizations refer residential mortgage loan clients to associated mortgage business. An associated mortgage business is frequently a separate subsidiary of the monetary institution's holding business or a subsidiary of another financial organization owned by the parent holding business. In order to motivate the banks's staff members to refer clients to the affiliated mortgage company, some mortgage business have actually provided to pay a small charge to the employee whenever the referral results in a loan origination. This practice is specifically forbidden by Section 3500.14( b), which mentions: "A business might not pay any other business or the staff members of any other business for the recommendation of settlement service company."
Builder Loans - Residential homebuilders can typically provide property loan referrals for a financial organization. In lots of circumstances, the same lender who finances the contractor's building and construction expenses is likewise attempting to stem loans to the contractor's home purchasing customers. In such cases, the monetary organization needs to be careful not to provide anything of worth to the contractor in exchange for the recommendation of these consumers.
